
A Simple Guide to Assessing Job Creation and Services
Old playbook: Do good, tell people, hope for applause.
New playbook: Prove it. Back it with numbers. Leverage results.
Good intentions are cheap. Results are currency. If you’re running a business or project, you need to show impact, not just claim it. Especially when it comes to job creation and essential services. Funding depends on it. Survival depends on it. Growth demands it.
Here’s the hard truth: No one cares about your mission statement if you can’t measure what you deliver. Execution is the only differentiator. Let’s get tactical.
Why Most Impact Measurement Fails
Old way:
Count “jobs created” by headcount.
List “services offered” and call it a day.
Collect testimonials and hope they impress.
New reality:
Track net new jobs, not recycled roles.
Measure outcomes, not activities.
Data beats anecdotes. Always.
Too many founders mistake motion for progress. Filling out forms, hosting events, posting on social media—none of that matters unless it moves the needle.
Step 1: Define What Actually Counts
A. Job Creation—Not Just Payroll, But Portfolio
Don’t just tally up hires. Ask:
Are these jobs net new?
Are they full-time, part-time, contract, or gig?
What’s the duration?
What’s the wage?
Are they building skills or just burning time?
Key metrics:
Net new jobs (subtract jobs lost from jobs created)
FTE (Full-Time Equivalent) count, not just headcount
Wage levels compared to local average
Skills gained per role
Binary contrast:
Old: “We hired 10 people.”
New: “We created 7 net new FTEs at 120% of the county median wage, with upskilling in digital tools.”
Why it matters:
Investors and grant-makers want leverage, not just activity. If your jobs are low-wage, high-churn, or temp-only, you’re renting time, not building assets.
B. Services Delivered—From Activity to Outcomes
Don’t just list services. Measure what changes.
What services did you provide?
How many people used them?
What changed for them as a result?
Key metrics:
Number of unique individuals served
Frequency of service use
Measurable outcome per user (e.g., % increase in income, % reduction in food insecurity, % increase in digital literacy)
Binary contrast:
Old: “We ran 5 workshops.”
New: “We moved 60% of attendees from unemployed to employed within 3 months.”
Why it matters:
Nobody funds activity. They fund outcomes. Scale what works, cut what doesn’t.
Step 2: Set Up Your Data Stack
Old way:
Spreadsheet chaos.
Paper sign-in sheets.
Guesswork.
New reality:
Centralized data stack.
Digital forms.
Real-time dashboards.
What you need:
A CRM or project management tool (Airtable, Notion, Monday.com)
Simple digital forms for intake (Google Forms, Typeform)
Dashboards for live metrics (Google Data Studio, Power BI)
What to track:
Participant info (anonymized for privacy)
Service usage logs
Job placement details
Follow-up surveys for outcomes
Execution tip: Automate data capture. Manual entry is a tax on growth. Set up workflows that pull data as you operate.
Step 3: Gather Data That Matters
A. Quantitative Data—The Backbone
Jobs created, jobs lost
Hours worked
Income change
Number of services delivered
Attendance rates
No rounding up. No “about 20.” Precision signals control.
B. Qualitative Data—The Signal Boost
Short surveys: “Did this service help you get a job? Yes/No.”
Pre/post assessments: “Rate your confidence in X skill, 1-5.”
Don’t overcomplicate. Three questions can tell you more than thirty. Keep it tight.
Step 4: Analyze and Benchmark
Old way:
Report raw numbers.
Hide behind jargon.
New reality:
Benchmark against your own baseline and against peers.
Show trend lines, not just snapshots.
How to benchmark:
Compare your job creation rate to local or industry averages.
Stack your service outcomes against last quarter or last year.
Highlight percentage improvement, not just totals.
Example:
“Job placement rate increased from 40% to 62% in Q2.”
“Average wage for placed candidates is 15% higher than county median.”
Show leverage. Show growth. Show you’re building an asset, not just filling a quota.
Step 5: Communicate Results Like an Operator
Old way:
Long reports.
Flowery language.
“We’re passionate about…”
New reality:
One-page dashboards.
Charts, not paragraphs.
“We moved X to Y. Here’s the proof.”
What to share:
Before/after snapshots
Key metrics (jobs, income, services, outcomes)
Brief narrative—one paragraph max
Execution tip:
Stakeholders want clarity, not drama. Investors, partners, and funders are busy. Respect their time. Give them the headline, the metric, and the next step.
Step 6: Use Feedback as Fuel
Chaos isn’t a threat. It’s feedback. If you’re missing targets, fix the process. Don’t blame the market.
If job placements stall, analyze where candidates drop off.
If services aren’t used, ask why—directly.
If wage growth lags, revisit training or placement partners.
Adapt fast. The only real failure is refusing to change.
Step 7: Build for Scale, Not Just Survival
Old way:
Measure just enough to satisfy funders.
Treat impact as a side project.
New reality:
Treat impact data as an asset.
Use it to win bigger grants, attract better talent, and build partnerships.
Execution is leverage. When you control your data, you control your story. When you control your story, you attract capital and talent.
Summary Checklist: Prove, Don’t Promise
[ ] Define net new jobs, not just hires
[ ] Measure outcomes, not just activities
[ ] Set up a digital data stack
[ ] Track precision metrics, both quantitative and qualitative
[ ] Benchmark against self and market
[ ] Communicate results in one page
[ ] Use feedback to iterate fast
[ ] Treat your impact data as an asset
Hard Truths
No one funds potential. They fund proof.
Activity is not impact. Output is not outcome.
Data is leverage. Own it. Use it. Scale with it.
Stop renting your narrative. Own your results. Build your portfolio. The market only pays for what it can measure.
Execution separates operators from dreamers. Which side are you on?
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the new approach to measuring community impact compared to traditional methods?
The blog outlines a shift from simply counting hires or listing services to proving impact with data. Instead of relying on headcount, testimonials, or activity totals, the new approach emphasizes measuring net new jobs, tracking outcomes rather than just activities, and backing up efforts with clear, quantitative results.
What metrics should be used to effectively measure job creation?
According to the blog, it is important to track metrics such as net new jobs (subtracting jobs lost from those created), the Full-Time Equivalent (FTE) count rather than just headcount, wage levels compared to local averages, and the skills gained per role. These metrics help distinguish between merely adding hires and truly building sustainable assets.
How can the impact of services delivered be measured?
The blog advises that instead of just listing or counting services provided, you should measure the outcomes. Key metrics include the number of unique individuals served, the frequency of service use, and specific, measurable changes for users (for example, increases in income or digital literacy). This outcome-based approach demonstrates real-world impact.
What are the key steps for setting up an effective data tracking system for impact measurement?
The blog recommends replacing chaotic spreadsheets and paper sign-in sheets with a centralized digital data stack. This includes using CRMs or project management tools (like Airtable or Notion), digital forms for intake (like Google Forms or Typeform), and real-time dashboards (using tools such as Google Data Studio or Power BI) to track participant information, service usage, and job placement details.
How should impact results be communicated to stakeholders?
The blog emphasizes clear, concise communication through one-page dashboards that feature charts and before/after snapshots instead of lengthy reports. The key is to present the headline metrics—such as jobs, income changes, and service outcomes—along with a brief narrative, ensuring that the story is backed by clear data and trend lines.
